Buffington and Reber: Gut-Brain Interactions -- Annie Bryant
I really enjoyed learning about an area of neuroscience and
microbiology that I don’t typically read about. The interaction between gut and
brain has definitely been a hot topic in the last few years, and it’s exciting
to see robust research published linking the two in development and manifestation
of psychological disorders. At my last co-op, we started to work on a mouse
model of Parkinson’s disease in which pathology-inducing alpha-synuclein is injected
peripherally and travels (presumably via the vagus nerve) to the midbrain and
cortex! This is in the context of findings that alpha synuclein aggregates can
originate in the gut and induce aggregation in the cortex and midbrain.
I found the Buffington et al. paper much easier to follow
and digest (no pun intended), and that’s likely at least in part why I
preferred this one to the Reber et al. paper. The use of heat-killed bacteria
was a great way to delineate vagus /gut interactions from immune response to
the bacteria. It’s particularly interesting that L. reuteri only had rescuing effects on MHFD offspring when
administered at 4 weeks, and not at 8 weeks. Autism does present very early in
development and perhaps there is a critical window after which changes cannot
be reversed (at least via this pathway). Alternatively, I wonder if the age of
the mouse affects the ability of the bacteria to colonize in the gut microbiome
after inoculation?
Their inclusion of LTP in the VTA ties in the aspect of reward
and salience of social interactions, a circuit that is likely dysregulated in
ASD and other social disorders. I liked the ideas they brought up in the conclusion
about combining multiple types of probiotics to address different endophenotypes
associated with ASD such as social deficits and perseveration. One thing I was
unclear on was the section detailing oxytocin levels in the hypothalamus of
MHFD offspring was the mechanism by which oxytocin levels actually decreased.
Buffington et al. state that reduced oxytocin immunoreactivity in PVN neurons
wasn’t due to an overall decrease in PVN neurons and leave it at that; is the
change due to modulation of oxytocin transcription factors? Or perhaps due to
post-translational modifications? Lastly, to directly identify a role for L.
reuteri in modulating the social deficits in MHFD offspring, it would be
interesting to see if knocking down L. reuteri in MRD offspring could elicit
similar social endophenotypes.
The Reber paper was quite dense and went in several
directions throughout, such that I think it could have been better suited as
several papers that expanded on some really interesting results – such as the increased
microglial density and changes to serotonin biosynthesis enzymes and
transporters. However, the results do paint a clear picture that M. vaccae immunization reduces submissive
responses to dominant mice in the CSC paradigm and increases microglia density
in the mPFC, which is implicated in fear expression and is linked to the dorsal
raphe nucleus, a major hub of serotonergic neurons. It’s important to note that
(as the authors point out) Iba1 antibodies label both resting and activated
microglia, and these microglial states exert significantly different effects on
the immune environment. It would be really interesting to follow this finding
further and use markers specific to activation like CD68.
One thing I noticed that Reber et al. don’t mention is that vehicle-treated
mice in the CSC paradigm exhibited decreased submissive postures over the 15
days shown in Fig 1A, while M. vaccae-treated
mice showed (reduced) consistent levels of submissive postures throughout the
experiment. Over a longer time period, would vehicle-treated mice also exhibit
similarly low frequency of submissive behaviors, perhaps indicating desensitization
to the paradigm? It was also interesting that Buffington et al. used heat-killed
bacteria (L. reuteri) as a negative control for their model, yet heat-killed
bacteria (M. vaccae) effectively ameliorated social endophenotype deficits in
the Reber et al. model.
Both Reber and Buffington highlight the role of environmental
factors in inflammation and psychological symptoms. Reber et al. note that the
prevalence of inflammatory diseases is increasing in urban locations, perhaps
due to reduced exposure to soil-based exposure. Buffington et al. show that (in
mice) offspring from a mother who consumed a high-fat diet during pregnancy are
more susceptible to social and neurological impairment. These factors are
particularly relevant for impoverished individuals in urban environments, who
may not get exposed to bacteria in nature and who may not have access to
healthy food options. Identifying causal relationships between gut microbiota
deficiencies and social/learning disabilities can help elucidate alternative
treatments and preventative measures.
Comments
Post a Comment