Estrogen and Self Administration of Cocaine - Annissa DeSilva
In
the articles this week Holly et al. and Vassoler et al. investigated how environmental
exposure to stress and genetic predisposition may lead to enhanced susceptibility
to cocaine addiction. Interestingly both studies separated the mice by sex to
observe sex specific differences in cocaine addiction. Holly et al found that
episodic stress exerted a larger effect on female mice versus male mice. Compared
to the stressed male stressed mice the female mice had a greater locomotor
response to cocaine and longer cocaine binges than males. What I found most
interesting about this paper was the discussion of gonadal hormones, specifically
estradiol’s implication in enhancing susceptibility to addiction. The
researchers took vaginal smears before each task, however concluded that only duration
walking after cocaine administration was affected by estrous cycle. Holly et al
suggest that in terms of cocaine binging, effects may not have been seen due to
the fact that the binge spanned the entire estrous cycle. The method of vaginal
smearing seems too “general” in a sense to actually investigate the role of estrogen
fluctuation in cocaine binging. A better experimental design would to repeat the
episodic stress paradigm on ovariectomized rats (OVX), where each experimental group is receiving
progesterone and estrogen replacement at levels that mimic each four phases of
the estrous cycle. This would allow for them to pin point at exactly what phases
this increased sensitization happens, and if progesterone may have an effect
since it is also elevated during the estrous cycle.
Vassoler
et al found that offspring of cocaine dependent rats inherited a decreased acquisition
for cocaine self-administration accompanied by increased levels of BDNF mRNA in
the pre frontal cortex but this was not seen in female offspring. The paper briefly
mentions circulating estrogen as a potential reason why no effects were seen because
its an enhancer of cocaine effects it also mentions progesterone having the
opposite effect. This was a little confusing because the highest levels of circulating
estrogen are during the estrous cycle but simultaneously during this time there
is a spike in progesterone. Either way it would be interesting to further explore
if the resistant phenotype was affected by estrogen interactions again by
seeing if the resistant phenotype is present in OVX, OVX+E, or OVX+P offspring.
This could potentially provide further clarification if the inability to inherent
the resistant phenotype is related to gonadal hormones or as the author also
mentions, the sexually dimorphic features of the brain.
Comments
Post a Comment